Sample Autobiography

When I sit back and consider the significant events in my past, the important aspects of my ongoing life, and my future goals, the underlying theme is one of appreciating diversity, especially across ethnic and socioeconomic class lines. I was born and raised in Brooklyn, spick-and-span York, the product of a Catholic father with roots in Italy and a Jewish mother of Russian and Austrian ancestry. In my early years of education, the frustration with teachers mispronouncing my live on name seemed as though it might never end.I remember how my father would approach the administrators of my chief(a) school before Honor Roll ceremonies to be sure they would pronounce it coiffely as I walked across the stage for my moment of glory. The terror did not end until the seventh grade when I had my graduation exercise course in Spanish, at which point my teacher had some experience with exotic names and got you-zee-nee correct on the first try.I believe that I grew more, emotionally, acce ssiblely, and adroitly, during my four years of high school than during some(prenominal) other period of time thus far. Midwood High School at Brooklyn College attracted students from every part of New York City. Indeed, it provided a rigorous academic environment, and with one college advisor for each graduating class of nearly 700 students, I managed to rook some important lessons roughly dealing with the system. Midwood continues to prepare its students well it has consistently placed among the top 50 in national rankings of high schools. It was at Midwood that I found my academic strengths and was given the tools to pursue them to the fullest bound possible. Because I was placed in a situation with few of the resources many students had in other better-funded schools, I learned how to make the best of the situation. I began to search for a way to address my own concerns about the racial tensions.Within a few years I would find myself at Texas A&M University, bringing anothe r drastic change in my lifestyle and the culture I would have to alter to. The past few years have been a very enjoyable experience, satisfying all of my intellectual and social needs. I have focused the next few years on developing a solid research program dealing with I have also put forth as much effort as possible in attempting to diversify the future of our profession. social psychological approaches to social issues, especially racial and ethnic relations.

Political films Essay

The research paper The Timing of Presidential Cinema discusses and analyzes social meaning of political films. short(p) research is done in this filed, although many films contain political and economic meaning. Interestingly, the release of presidential motion picture is associated with the controlling party and with the ideology that the party has in the White House. Republican and Democratic administrations are characterized by the largest amount of political films. Moreover, more films are released during the second presidential term.Releases are more acute during presidential elections. The stronger the economies, the more films about presidents are released. The word Quantitative analysis of Motion Picture Content tends to judge the influence of films on American population. In particular, the emphasis is paid to providing an instrument to measure with scientific clearcutness the content of each film. The cinema has long been accepted and the author argues that more than f ifty million of American moviegoers are influenced by desire to seek entertainment when going to the cinema.Therefore, motion picture has become a profound influence on people and it is rather difficult to measure those influence. The role of Hollywood films in American society has not been yet questioned as researchers lack methods to summarize and analyze what the public is presented. The article The Image of the Scientist in acquaintance Fiction A Content Analysis reviews the social role of the scientists which is conveyed by dint of the cinema.Scientists has undergone both criticism and appraisal, they has been presented as heroes and villains science-fiction magazines, stories and films. Of course, many scientists have been negligible. The social role of the scientist is addressed in hurt of saving humanity, but after World War II such measurement has become problematic. Science fiction, therefore, is claimed to serve as vehicle to construct social utopias and to dethrone th em. The article is of practical relevance as the USA experience shortage of scientists and engineers.

James Jarvis Essay

In Alan Patons Cry, the Beloved Country thither is two protagonists, Reverend Stephen Kumalo, and crowd together Jarvis. Both characters play significant roles to the storey but crowd Jarvis situation is noneworthy and inspirational. James is an influential, dynamic character because his opinion dramatically counterchanges upon exercise his intelligences manuscript. A series of events influences James to shift his mindset into the mindset of his watchword. An analysis on James Jarvis changing mindset reveals that his countersigns manuscript, realizing his shortcomings, and Reverend Kumalo are all things that cause him to change drastically.When James son, Arthur, dies he visits Arthurs home and finds his incomplete manuscript. When reading his writings, James finds that his son would have risked anything to booster other people, and ended up doing just that. Although James is hurt by the fact that Arthur writes about his parents in a negative way ..But of South Africa I fi nded nothing at all. (207), James takes the reprimand and improves from it by continuing his sons battle. James discovers that his son researches trework forcedously on the problems of their society, and was seeking economic aid in the development of the social structure in South Africa. Arthurs house contains hundreds of books and between the books there were four pictures, of Christ crucified, and Abraham Lincoln, and the white gabled house of Vergelegen, and a painting of leafless willows by a river in a wintry veld. (176) From these pictures of Jesus, Lincoln, the gabled hose, and the leafless willow discloses the symbolism that Arthur admires.Jesus and Lincoln were men of action they showed love for their friends, and at the corresponding time, their enemies. These two men suffered and died for their beliefs, the same way Arthur did. A weewee willow represents freedom, therefore, it can be concluded that the painting of the leafless willows represents a loss of freedom for the blacks in South Africa and how Arthur wants to gain their freedom back and help them get equal rights. When his son is shot and killed, James gets to eventually know and understand him and his values. Jarvis filled his pipe slowly, and listened to the tale of his, to this tale of a stranger (172). James reads his sons speeches and understands his areas segregation, relieving him of his ignorance. This comparison enables James to better understand his son and realize how concerned and dedicate Arthur was for a change in humanity.After James discovers his sons views, James starts to realize his shortcomings, and realizes that the problems of others and not only of his own. James begins to help the minority. Since his sons death and the acquaintance of Stephen, James donates 1000 pounds to the African boys club. Jarvis is not just giving the money as a gift alternatively he gives the money to the club because he knew the club would improve the countrys condition. Using his sons views again, James decides to do something about Kumalos village, which is falling apart. He sends milk for the children, an agricultural expert, and builds a church for Ndotsheni. James builds the church because the current church in Ndotsheni is old.James and Stephen both live in the farming areas of South Africa, share the love for the same land, and what is in their lives. They each have a son of whom they consider a stranger but after they lose their sons, they begin to understand them. They both learn the problems in South Africa through their sons, and after realization, they both try to do something to improve the social, and racial differences which iniquity Johannesburg. Both men are strong but James Jarvis has to be the strongest for his ability to take his sons death the way he does. Instead of being an irate, cruel, sorrowful man he picks up where his son left off. Its realistic that James can be forgiving to Stephen even though he is the father of Absalom, the boy who killed Arthur Jarvis. James Jarvis reacts this way because he doesnt want anyone else to experience the same thing that happened to him instead he wants to fix the problem before it occurs again.When his son is shot and killed, James finally gets to know and understand him and his values. Jarvis filled his pipe slowly, and listened to the tale of his son, to this tale of a stranger (172). He reads his sons speeches and understands his countrys segregation, relieving him of his ignorance. James Jarvis was a dynamic character that changes throughout the novel. The representation shows how South African problems educate James Jarvis, andturned him into an understanding, and influential man. If Arthur Jarvis had never been killed, James Jarvis wouldve not been educated by his sons writings or by Stephen Kumalo.

Critical Thinking Assignment Essay

The catalogue from Salvador Monella to the Board of Directors addresses the rising costs of employee healthc be benefits at Penn-Mart. His communication includes an rendering of his purpose in addressing the healthc atomic number 18 costs, findings regarding Penn-Marts benefits costs, a recommended program to implement for cost inflameduction, and a intelligence containing support for their recommendation. term some business people whitethorn be tempted to simply assume the entropy presented in Mr. Monellas muniment, it is my opinion, after reading Br knowledgee and Keeleys Asking the Right Questions (2012), that adopting a minute thought approach is the most effective way to evaluate the document. Using a detailed mentation approach to evaluate this business document allow help a reader to know when to accept and when to reject in classation they are presented.The reader knows that randomness that passes the critical thinking apparent motions they ask is expense acce pting. Implementing strong-sense critical thinking and using the same skills to evaluate all selects, even ones own, prevents falling to conventionality. In the xth edition of Asking the Right Questions (Browne & Keeley, 2012), thither are ten critical questions to ask that are presented. The ten questions are What are the issues and the conclusions?, What are the reasons?, Which words or phrases are ambiguous?, What are the cheer and descriptive assumptions?, Are there any fallacies in the reasoning?, How good is the evidence?, Are there rival ca functions?,Are the statistics deceptive?, What significant information is omitted?, What reasonable conclusions are likely? (Browne & Keeley, p. 9) After ask and evaluating each of these questions, a reader will have a solid basis on which to steady down if Mr. Monellas recommendations should be accepted. It is my opinion that his recommendations should non be accepted until more information is supportd. separately of the ten crit ical thinking questions will be evaluated in order to demonstrate how this conclusion was reached.The first question a critical brain must(prenominal) ask when reading is, What are the issues and conclusions? (Browne & Keely, p. 18) As a reader, it is all- big(a) to spot the issue the author is discussing and the conclusion they have drawn in order to successfully form an opinion regarding the information presented. The issue is the topic that an author is addressing, while the conclusion is the message they intend to get down to the reader.There are two types of issues- descriptive issues and prescriptive issues. A descriptive issue poses questions regarding descriptions of the past, present, or future. normative issues pose questions intimately actions that should be interpreted, what is ethical or moral, and what is good or bad they are issues that take on prescriptive answers. In the memorandum, Mr. Monella presents a descriptive issue that requires an answer to describ e how the work place will be in the future. How can Penn-Mart control the cost of employee health care benefits? The conclusion presented is to implement a impudent wellness program call the take aim thoroughly program.The second question that must be address is, What are the reasons? (Browne & Keeley, p. 29) Reasons are the statements an author provides that support or justify their conclusion. As the book states, you can non determine the worth of a conclusion until you identify the reasons. (p. 29) In order to identify the reasons supplied by an author, a critical judgment must ask why the author believes their conclusion. In the memorandum, the reasons stated support the conclusion of initiating a consume Well program. The memorandum states that information indicates that individuals who voluntarily miss their health account for the greatest impact on the growth in benefits costs. The data includes smokers, individuals who do not exercise, and those who avoid preventative care in the company in question. The second reason given is that the program will make employees more aware of their own health status and identify issues they can improve to become more fit.Other reasons provided by the memorandum are that the initiatory aligns with other earthly concern health world-classs, there have been other studies on obesity, the initiative will provide initiative for employees to adopt healthier lifestyles, and it will make employees feel better or so themselves. After identifying the basic structure of a message, a critical thinker must ask, What words or phrases are ambiguous? (p. 40) An ambiguous word or phrase is one that has multiple possible meanings.equivocal words or phrases in an argument create the need for clarification of the meaning before a reader can fully evaluate the argument. When reading a document such as the memorandum, it is implemental to mark ambiguous words or phrases in statements as they occur. The ambiguous terms identifi ed in the memorandum have been italicized. The objective of the Get Well program is tohelp them identify issues that they could mitigate on their own to become more fit. (p. 2) The Get Well initiative completely aligns with other current public health and fitness objectives (p. 2)There have been numerous look studies on obesity published in scholarly journals. (p. 2) We firmly believe that many Penn-Mart employees want to get fit and that the Get Well initiative will provide the requisite incentives Giving a blood sample and filling out a survey form is not intrusive or burdensome these are two things that people do routinely. Those who might oppose Get Well are either unfit, or they have something to hide. (p. 2) These recommendations have been good researched and represent state-of-the-art in our field. (p. 2) Each of the italicized phrases can either have multiple meanings, or is not specific enough to use to determine the statements validity. For mannikin, the suggested prog ram is mean to help identify employee health issues, however different people whitethorn consider different things to be health issues.While one somebody may consider smoking to be a health issue, others may not. totally aligning with objectives may mean that initiatives are designed by the same person, implemented for the same group of people, and intended to accomplish the same goal however it also may mean that it has the same general objective. Each ambiguous term has the same possibility of containing various meanings. Next a critical thinker must ask the fourth critical question, What are the revalue and descriptive assumptions? Assumptions are beliefs that are generally taken for granted that support the reasoning and conclusion of an argument. Value assumptions demonstrate a preference for one value over another. Descriptive assumptions demonstrate beliefs about the world. In the memorandum both value and descriptive assumptions are demonstrated. The value assumption dem onstrated is equality versus individualism. Mr. Monella states that is unfair to young, healthy people to let employees unequally use healthcare insurance resources. This demonstrates a preference for individualism over equality.The descriptive assumption in the memorandum involves beliefs about Penn-Marts healthcare benefits strategy and controlling the cost of the employee healthcare program. It assumes that there are no other ways to control spending, other than by implementing the Get Well program. Fifth, a critical thinker must ask, Are there any fallacies in the reasoning? (p. 74) Fallacies are logic tricks an author may use to lure a reader into accepting their conclusion. There are multiple fallacies in the memorandum. First, the authors claim that the Get Well will make Penn-Mart employees feel better about themselves, which appeals to emotions. The memorandum states that the recommendations have been exhaustively researched and represent state-of-the-art in our field, whi ch appeals to questionable authority the researchers and qualifications for being state of the art have not been specified. Those who might oppose Get Well are claimed to be either unfit, or they have something to hide, which attacks person rather than ideas.The net statement, to quote the famous Charles Darwin, survival of the fittest is a natural part of evolution, introduces a red herring. The next step in evaluating the conclusion is to ask, How good is the evidence? (p. 92) The memorandum cites data from underwriters that indicates individuals who voluntarily neglect their health account for the greatest impact employee healthcare benefits costs, which is the author using a case example as evidence. The underwriters believe that many Penn-Mart employees want to get fit, which generalizes the desires of a portion of the employees to the entire population. Cited published research studies on obesity appeal to authority. A research study is used as evidence with data from underwr iters is cited twice. The Get Well program is claimed to make Penn-Mart employees feel better about themselves, generalizing from the research sample. Finally, an employee survey about satisfaction with their benefits could be a biased survey. Are there rival causes? (p. 128)This question helps evaluate an arguments strength by examining any other reasonable causes for the event in question. Rival outcomes would provide different causes for the rising employee healthcare benefits costs at Penn-Mart. The memorandum states that the rise in benefits costs is drive by causes such as an aging workforce with tenure. However, other possible causes exist, such as pretension for common medical procedures such as physical examinations. The memorandum also demonstrates thefundamental attribution flaw by citing individuals who voluntarily neglect their health (p. 1), although there may be other reasons they do not exercise, such as preexisting conditions like arthritis. While statistics may seem like impressive additions to an argument, they may also be deceptive. They frequently do not prove what they appear to prove. (p. 142) Knowing the unreliableness of statistics makes it important for a critical thinker to ask, are the statistics deceptive? (p. 142)Statistics stating that wages and benefits make up roughly 40 percent of Penn-Marts annual budget are cited, however 40% is not clearly outlined or accurately identified. Also cited is data from underwriters indicating that participation in voluntary health benefits programs peaked at 5% of total FTEs in 2006 (p. 1), but what does 5% of total FTE amount to? The 5% is once more not clearly defined or accurately identified. Equally as significant as the information included in an argument is the significant information that is omitted. Omitting significant information from an argument shapes the reasoning in favor of the author. In order to judge the quality of an arguments reasoning, a critical thinker must ask, what si gnificant information is omitted? (p. 153) For example, in Penn-Marts situation, the potential long-term negative effects of the Get Well program are omitted. Could the program have negative consequences?The suggestions state that employees who do not approve with the terms of Get Well should be given the possibility of paying a fine, declining future healthcare benefits, resigning, or being fired. However, the memorandum does not address what the consequences might be of the majority of employees refusing Get Well would be to Penn-Mart. If the company selects to fire those employees, they may lose many workers, causing the whole organization to suffer. The final question to ask in the critical thinking model is, what reasonable conclusions are possible? (p. 163) As a critical thinker, the objective is to determine and accept the most reasonable conclusion(s) to an argument that most closely adheres to personal value preferences. There are frequently alternative conclusions or mult iple conclusions that are possible given the reasoning of an argument.For example, one conclusion to the Penn-Mart situation is that the Get Well program is the best tooth root to rising healthcare costs. Another conclusion may be that there is another program that may be a better fit for Penn-Mart. After asking and evaluatingall ten of the critical questions to ask, I believe that I have determined the most reasonable conclusion. To determine the best conclusion, it would be necessary to obtain clarification about the ambiguous terms before evaluating the arguments strength. Without that information it is not possible to make a firm opinion about the strength of reasoning. Until the clarification is provided, it is my opinion that the suggestions of the adviser company should not be accepted. There are too many ambiguous terms and fallacies employ to determine that the argument is strong enough for acceptance.ResourcesBrowne, M. N., & Keeley, S.M. (2010). Asking the right questi ons A guide to critical thinking (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ Pearson/Prentice Hall.

Assignment #4 The Ragan Revolution through President Obamma Essay

Assignment 4 The Ragan Revolution through and through chairman Obamma - Essay ExampleOne of the major historical turning points during Regans error is aid epidemic. AIDs killed millions of people during this period but the main tragedy was not the disease but the lack of comely action to control it. One of the reasons behind this situation was the belief that AID s could only be contracted by homosexuals. President Reagan was reluctant thus did not fully supportive of the disease give-and-take as he didnt want to anger the Christian conservatives. The American public only came to fulfil the reality of the disease after a hemophiliac teenager contracted AIDS virus through blood transfusion and the public confession of Magic Johnson announcing that he too had contracted the virus.The other lawsuit was the expansion of the southern states to the western dangerous regions as well as their efforts to tame new frontiers. During this period, the wives of the army men were made to enj oy a different status. This was completely different in comparison to the womanhood rights during the America colonization and civil war period. The areas allowed their women to take part in civil society and pick out as well as assuming the judge position. The culture of the army wives gave women equal eminence at the time of frontier expansion. As this took place in the western frontiers, the rest of the states conserved their male sound out societies. This situation led to the frontier women to enjoy a status that was special following the forward posts isolation pockets and the community transformation into a society during threat and danger times so as to cover existing efficiently. The end result was that the women ended up sharing the same responsibilities with the men and their system allowed a combined authority while the eastern states stuck to their traditional culture of having the males dominate in everything.

Compensation (HRMD) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Compensation (HRMD) - Essay ExampleConsequently, the desirable outcomes such as reducing in poverty, greater availability of short-term employment opportunities, increase in GDP etc. be obtained, which lead to societal well-being and prosperity. For instance, technological advancement increases labor productivity, process and product innovation, specialization, communication and superman networks. In turn, the economies of scale (mass production) is observed, which reduces total business costs and lowers market prices. Finally, the aggregate consumption and demand increases because of overall improvement in economy.However, any underlying weaknesses or negative feedback may transform a good into a vicious circle. In contrast, the latter has undesirable outcomes and negative consequences such as increase in poverty and unemployment, economic contraction, low aggregate consumption and output etc. For instance, constant increase in money supply may result in inflation that, in turn, will reduce sure incomes in society. Consequently, the aggregate consumption will reduce and economy will observe negative appendage rate (Samuelson & Nordhaus, 2009).The Organizational structure refers to internal managerial system and hierarchy. In fact, it showcases the how tasks into departments are assigned, how they are delegated and how decision-making and capital punishment is being done and at various managerial levels. Indeed, the organizational chart is a diagram that shows the top, fondness and first-line management levels as well as reveals the structure (vertical functional, divisional, matrix, virtual and networking) that firm has adopted. The internal structure is super important in todays new workplace business environment because it determines the chain of command, which refers to the situation executives enjoy because of their position based on which they are deemed responsible for decision-making, problem solving, strategic planning,